Amarissa Kiara Toth vs Elizabeth Mandlik Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 30 May at 09:22 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Kiara Toth vs E. Mandlik

HUN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Toth 1 - 0 Mandlik
They have played 2 sets in total, with Amarissa Kiara Toth winning 2 and Elizabeth Mandlik winning 0. The last match between Amarissa Kiara Toth and Elizabeth Mandlik was at the W50 Otocec, 31-05-2025, Round: SF, Surface: Clay, with Amarissa Kiara Toth getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Toth | 1 |
| Mandlik | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(SF) W50 Otocec(05-31-25)
A. K. Toth vs E. Mandlik H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $5,922 | Career Prize Money | $317,135 |
| 66.04% (175-90) | Career Total W/L | 56.66% (200-153) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 8 | Titles | 9 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 33.33% (1-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-3) |
A. K. Toth vs E. Mandlik Match Preview:
- How does Toth's serve compare to Mandlik's in recent matches? Toth has won 39.02% of points on their second serve, while Mandlik has a slight edge at 40.31%.
- Who has shown better return game performance? In recent form, Mandlik leads by winning 56.3% of second serve return points compared to Toth's 51.34%. However, Toth has an advantage in first serve returns, winning 39.29% to Mandlik's 36.95%.
- Under pressure scenarios reveal that Mandlik has saved 45.71% of breakpoints compared to Toth's 42.81%, which could be significant for in-game betting predictions.
- Overall match performance favors Toth, who has won 70.27% of their matches over the last year, compared to Mandlik's 55.74% win rate.
- On which surface do these players excel? Toth excels on Clay with a 69% win rate, while Mandlik performs best on Hard courts with a 59% win rate.
- Toth has mostly competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments with a 70% win rate, whereas Mandlik has a 55.56% win rate at a similar event level.
- The average rank of Toth's opponents is 392.39, while Mandlik has faced tougher competition with an average rank of 278.11 over the past 12 months.
- In deciding sets, Toth has the upper hand, winning 47% compared to Mandlik's 43% in the past year.
- Who has the better breakpoint conversion rate? Mandlik converts 42.41% of opportunities, slightly outperforming Toth's 39.91%.
Editorial Prediction (May 30, 2025, UTC):
When analyzing recent performance statistics, Mandlik shows a small edge in key areas such as second serve performance and breakpoint conversion rate. This can make a significant difference in tight matches.
Though Toth demonstrates superior overall match performance in the past year, Mandlik's experience against stronger competition and slightly better performance under pressure could tilt the balance.
Toth's strength on clay contrasts with Mandlik's preference for hard courts, indicating surface may play a role depending on the event's conditions.
Given Mandlik's slight edge in critical areas and Toth's superior overall record, predicting the winner is challenging. However, based on recent trends and competitive adversaries, Mandlik appears slightly more poised to clinch the victory in this upcoming tennis match.
Amarissa Kiara Toth vs Elizabeth Mandlik Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. K. Toth vs E. Mandlik H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:21:7 | Average Match Time | 1:21:7 |
| 75% (39/52) | 1st Serve % | 52% (29/56) |
| 62% (24/39) | 1st Serve Win % | 48% (14/29) |
| 54% (7/13) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (14/27) |
| 71% (5/7) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (2/4) |
| 50% (28/56) | Return Points Win % | 40% (21/52) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. K. Toth Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R3 | L | w/o | ||
R2 | W | 6-3 1-6 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 6-1 6-4 | ||
QF | L | 7-6(3) 6-0 | ||
R2 | W | 4-6 6-2 6-2 | ||
E. Mandlik Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 6-1 6-3 | ||
R2 | W | 6-3 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-1 | ||
SF | L | 7-5 6-1 | ||
QF | W | 6-4 7-5 | ||

A. K. Toth vs E. Mandlik Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66.04% (175/90) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.66% (200/153) |
| 64.16% (376/210) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.41% (456/367) |
| 56.94% (2906/2198) | Games Win/Loss | 52.86% (3998/3565) |
| 42.86% (3/4) | Hard Win/Loss | 59.28% (115/79) |
| 67.66% (159/76) | Clay Win/Loss | 54.96% (72/59) |
| 56.52% (13/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 12.50% (1/7) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 60.00% (12/8) |
| 0.03 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 79 | Aces Total | 572 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.41 |
| 680 | Total Double Faults | 1505 |
| 1:29:58 | Average Match Time | 1:33:5 |
| 450.75 | Average Opponent Rank | 391.25 |
| 70% (10808/15365) | 1st Serve % | 56% (12849/22906) |
| 57% (6170/10808) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (8031/12849) |
| 46% (2088/4557) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (4491/10056) |
| 54% (1269/2358) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 52% (1540/2987) |
| 52% (8030/15516) | Return Points Win % | 48% (10931/22928) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 47.83% (11/12) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 28.57% (4/10) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 42.86% (3/4) | Main Tour W/L | 50.00% (23/23) |
| 61.78% (97/60) | Challenger W/L | 56.60% (120/92) |
| 75.51% (74/24) | Futures W/L | 72.41% (42/16) |
| 67% (167/249) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (197/349) |
| 29% (2/7) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 61% (20/33) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 38% (25/66) |
| 56% (33/59) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (62/121) |
| 87% (176/153) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (195/168) |
| 13% (176/22) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (195/27) |
| 26% (88/23) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (158/32) |